Midtrix
Midtrix
  • Home
  • About
  • Low Chargebacks 101
  • Learn About VAMP
  • Our Process

Are You Ready for VAMP?

 Visa’s new VAMP (Visa Acquirer Monitoring Program) is here—changing how fraud and disputes are tracked. Don’t get caught off guard. Midtrix gives you real-time visibility, automated alerts, and expert tools to stay compliant and stay profitable. 

 

The updated program introduces a new transaction count-based metric called the VAMP ratio. This metric combines reported fraud and non-fraud chargebacks into a single measurement, providing a clearer picture of overall risk.

Merchants will also need to account for a criterion called enumerated transactions. Similar to brute force attacks, these refer to unauthorized attempts to test payment card details by systematically guessing combinations of card numbers, CVV codes, and expiration dates to identify valid card information.

EVERYTHING YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT VAMP

VAMP Ratio

Ratio Thresholds & Effective Dates

Enumeration Ratio

 To level set, the VAMP ratio is the sum of CNP fraud cases (called TC40) and non-fraud disputes (TC15, dispute conditions 11, 12, and 13) with a monthly minimum of 1000 transactions. This numerator is then divided by the total number of settled CNP transactions to yield the VAMP ratio. 

 

  1. Start with all your fraud and dispute cases — speci

 To level set, the VAMP ratio is the sum of CNP fraud cases (called TC40) and non-fraud disputes (TC15, dispute conditions 11, 12, and 13) with a monthly minimum of 1000 transactions. This numerator is then divided by the total number of settled CNP transactions to yield the VAMP ratio. 

 

  1. Start with all your fraud and dispute cases — specifically:
     
    • Fraud reports (TC40)
       
    • Non-fraud disputes like:
       
      • Processing errors
         
      • Customer complaints
         
      • Issues with services or products (TC15, dispute codes 11, 12, 13)
         

  1. Only count it if your business had at least 1,000 online/card-not-present (CNP) transactions in the month.
     
  2. Then divide that total number of fraud and dispute cases by your total CNP transactions that were successfully processed and settled.
     

That final number is your VAMP ratio. The higher it is, the more likely Visa is to flag you for risk.

Enumeration Ratio

Ratio Thresholds & Effective Dates

Enumeration Ratio

 In addition to the fraud and dispute ratio, VAMP will introduce changes to the enumeration ratio to better address the problem of enumeration attacks. This calculation is the number of enumerated authorization transactions (both approved and declined) divided by the total number of CNP authorized transactions with a monthly minimum of 30

 In addition to the fraud and dispute ratio, VAMP will introduce changes to the enumeration ratio to better address the problem of enumeration attacks. This calculation is the number of enumerated authorization transactions (both approved and declined) divided by the total number of CNP authorized transactions with a monthly minimum of 300,000 enumerated transactions, identified and confirmed via the VAAI (Visa Attack Account Intelligence) Score system. 

 

VAMP is also looking at bot attacks where fraudsters try lots of stolen card numbers to find one that works. This is called an enumeration attack.

To track this, Visa uses something called the enumeration ratio:

  • They count how many times bots tried card numbers on your system (even if the transactions failed).
     
  • Then they compare that to all your online/card-not-present (CNP) transaction attempts.
     
  • Visa only looks at this if at least 300,000 suspicious tries happen in a month.
     

If that ratio is high, it means your system might be getting hit by bots, and Visa could take action.

Program Administration

Ratio Thresholds & Effective Dates

Ratio Thresholds & Effective Dates

 Much as the name suggests, one critical difference is that this new program will be administered at the acquirer level, replacing the existing merchant side programs. We’ll talk about the implications of this shortly.  

 

One big change with VAMP is who it applies to.

Instead of focusing just on merchants, Visa will now hold payment process

 Much as the name suggests, one critical difference is that this new program will be administered at the acquirer level, replacing the existing merchant side programs. We’ll talk about the implications of this shortly.  

 

One big change with VAMP is who it applies to.

Instead of focusing just on merchants, Visa will now hold payment processors (acquirers) responsible.

This means the whole processor's portfolio is being watched, not just individual businesses.

We’ll explain what this means and why it matters next.

Ratio Thresholds & Effective Dates

Ratio Thresholds & Effective Dates

Ratio Thresholds & Effective Dates

 Effective April 1, 2025, the ‘Excessive’ category for acquirers is >=50 bps. Effective January 1, 2026, two threshold categories will be in play: ‘Above Standard’, defined as >=30 to <50 bps, and the ‘Excessive’ threshold at >=50 bps. On top of this, there is a merchant-specific threshold as well, and fines will apply accordingly at the 

 Effective April 1, 2025, the ‘Excessive’ category for acquirers is >=50 bps. Effective January 1, 2026, two threshold categories will be in play: ‘Above Standard’, defined as >=30 to <50 bps, and the ‘Excessive’ threshold at >=50 bps. On top of this, there is a merchant-specific threshold as well, and fines will apply accordingly at the merchant level. Effective April 1, 2025, ‘Excessive’ is defined as >=150 bps, and effective April 2026 ‘Excessive’ will move down to >=90 bps. It’s critical to note that the VAMP ratio will exclude resolutions from pre-dispute tools, including RDR (Rapid Dispute Resolution), CDRN (Cardholder Dispute Resolution Network), and the Compelling Evidence 3.0 program. Exclusions will also be granted for any data processed through Visa Net which is card network agnostic.


 

Starting April 1, 2025, Visa will begin enforcing VAMP thresholds for both acquirers (processors) and merchants.

For Acquirers (Processors):

  • If your VAMP ratio is 50 bps (0.50%) or higher, you’ll be labeled "Excessive" starting April 2025.
     
  • Then, starting January 1, 2026, Visa adds a second category:
     
    • "Above Standard" = 30–49 bps (0.30% to 0.49%)
       
    • "Excessive" = 50 bps (0.50%) or more
       

For Merchants:

  • From April 1, 2025, if a merchant’s VAMP ratio is 150 bps (1.50%) or higher, they’re considered "Excessive" and may face fines.
     
  • Starting April 2026, that threshold lowers to 90 bps (0.90%).
     

Important Details:

  • Some dispute types won’t count toward your VAMP ratio, like:
     
    • RDR (Rapid Dispute Resolution)
       
    • CDRN (Cardholder Dispute Resolution Network)
       
    • Compelling Evidence 3.0 cases
       
  • Transactions processed through systems outside of Visa’s own tools (VisaNet) may also be excluded.
     

Fines

Grace Periods

Grace Periods

 For acquirers, USD $5 will apply for each CNP fraud and dispute non-fraud in the ‘Above Standard’ threshold. USD $10 USD will apply in the ‘Excessive’ threshold. If acquirer performance is above the specified threshold, fees will apply to each fraud and non-fraud dispute for all merchants with a VAMP ratio >=30 bps. In addition, if merch

 For acquirers, USD $5 will apply for each CNP fraud and dispute non-fraud in the ‘Above Standard’ threshold. USD $10 USD will apply in the ‘Excessive’ threshold. If acquirer performance is above the specified threshold, fees will apply to each fraud and non-fraud dispute for all merchants with a VAMP ratio >=30 bps. In addition, if merchant performance is above the specified ‘Excessive’ threshold, a $10 fee will apply to each fraud and non-fraud dispute for that merchant only. It’s worth noting that while the program includes fines at both acquirer portfolio and merchant level, all fines will be administered to the acquirer. The acquirer will then have to determine how they pass those fees down to the merchant.  

 

Visa will start charging fees when VAMP ratios get too high. Here's how it works:

For Acquirers (Processors):

  • If the acquirer's portfolio is:
     
    • Above Standard (30–49 bps) → $5 fee for every fraud or non-fraud dispute
       
    • Excessive (50+ bps) → $10 fee per dispute
       
  • These fees apply to all merchants under that acquirer who have a VAMP ratio of 30 bps or more.
     

For Merchants:

  • If a merchant’s VAMP ratio is Excessive (e.g. 150 bps in 2025, 90 bps in 2026) → $10 fee per fraud or non-fraud dispute
     

Important:

  • Visa sends all fines to the acquirer, not directly to the merchant.
     
  • It's up to the acquirer to decide how (or if) to pass those costs on to each merchant.
     

Grace Periods

Grace Periods

Grace Periods

  For first-time identifications withing a rolling 12-month period, a three-month grace period will be given before enforcement actions are taken. Identifications after the grace period will be fully subject to published fines.  


If it’s your first time being flagged within a 12-month period, Visa will give you a 3-month grace period to fi

  For first-time identifications withing a rolling 12-month period, a three-month grace period will be given before enforcement actions are taken. Identifications after the grace period will be fully subject to published fines.  


If it’s your first time being flagged within a 12-month period, Visa will give you a 3-month grace period to fix the issue.

  • During this time: No fines or penalties.
     
  • After 3 months: If the problem isn’t fixed, full fines will apply based on the published rules.
     

You don’t have to navigate VAMP alone — we’ve got your back.

Impacts, Consequences & Recommendations

Impacts, Consequences & Recommendations

Impacts, Consequences & Recommendations

 

The new Visa Acquirer Monitoring Program (VAMP) is not just a policy update—it’s a major overhaul of how fraud and dispute activity is tracked, measured, and penalized across the payment ecosystem. This shift carries serious consequences for both merchants and acquirers, and demands proactive preparation.

While the advisory notices and grace periods may seem generous, the reality is that adapting operational processes, implementing monitoring tools, and addressing risk at scale will require time and effort. Delaying action increases the likelihood of non-compliance, penalties, and reputational harm.

Key Implications:

  • Tighter Oversight: Acquirers are now directly accountable for portfolio-level performance, creating pressure to better monitor and control merchant risk.
     
  • Financial Penalties: New fine structures will impact both acquirers and merchants, with potential pass-through costs and strained partnerships.
     
  • Operational Burden: Businesses will need to improve fraud prevention, dispute handling, and data reporting workflows—fast.
     
  • Limited Exclusions: Most pre-dispute tools (like RDR, CDRN, and CE 3.0) won’t reduce your VAMP score—meaning traditional mitigation efforts may no longer be enough.
     

Recommendations:

  1. Audit current dispute and fraud performance now—identify at-risk merchants and transactions.
     
  2. Implement stronger fraud tools and pre-dispute resolution processes.
     
  3. Enhance reporting and analytics capabilities to track VAMP ratio drivers in real time.
     
  4. Collaborate with acquirers proactively to understand how fees may be passed down.
     
  5. Train teams to recognize the importance of dispute handling and bot attack prevention.

Use of Risk & Dispute Mitigation Tools

Impacts, Consequences & Recommendations

Impacts, Consequences & Recommendations

 Both merchants and acquirers need to carefully evaluate how VAMP will affect their risk, fraud, and dispute prevention strategies. Implementing and optimizing these tools takes time, so it’s crucial to act quickly. With fraud and dispute controls becoming stricter at the network level, heightened vigilance and stronger defenses are now more important than ever for everyone involved. 

Agnostic Dispute Resolution Tools

Impacts, Consequences & Recommendations

Agnostic Dispute Resolution Tools

 

It is especially critical for merchants to fully understand and closely monitor the carve-outs and exceptions that will be offered within the VAMP framework. These include tools and programs provided directly by Visa—such as Rapid Dispute Resolution (RDR), Cardholder Dispute Resolution Network (CDRN), and the Compelling Evidence 3.0 (CE 3.0) program—which are designed to help reduce disputes before they escalate to chargebacks.

In addition to these Visa-owned solutions, merchants should also evaluate the effectiveness of other agnostic fraud and dispute mitigation tools—those that operate independently of the Visa network. These third-party services often use direct integrations with Visa issuers to proactively resolve disputes and prevent chargebacks. However, it’s important to recognize that the new VAMP program may impact how these agnostic tools are recognized or credited in VAMP calculations, potentially limiting their ability to lower dispute ratios.

Given these complexities, merchants must take a strategic approach to leveraging both Visa’s native tools and external solutions. This means not only understanding which tools qualify for carve-outs under VAMP but also continuously assessing their impact and integration within existing risk management workflows. Staying informed and agile in this area will be essential to minimizing fines, reducing fraud losses, and maintaining compliance under the evolving program requirements.

Midtrix

support@midtrix.com

Copyright © 2025 Midtrix - All Rights Reserved.

Powered by

This website uses cookies.

We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.

Accept